On 4/1/06, dragoran <dragoran@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have noticed that when I have package foo-1.0.i386 installed and some > other (x86_64) repo has foo-1.1.x86_64 yum updates foo and removes the > i386 one. > (livna mplayerplug-in was it here). > Updates should not be crossarch a i386 package should only be updated to > a i386 one (same for x86_64). > Any reason for doing this? Or is this a bug thats needs to be filled? > Can you give an actual example? Also, did you change your /etc/yum.conf file? There is a setting, exactarch, which controls whether yum will upgrade to across architectures. The default is exactarch=1. It is even more strict than x86_64/i386; it won't upgrade between glibc.i386 and glibc.i686 for exampe. - Ian -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list