On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 08:28 +0200, dragoran wrote: > I have noticed that when I have package foo-1.0.i386 installed and some > other (x86_64) repo has foo-1.1.x86_64 yum updates foo and removes the > i386 one. > (livna mplayerplug-in was it here). > Updates should not be crossarch a i386 package should only be updated to > a i386 one (same for x86_64). > Any reason for doing this? Or is this a bug thats needs to be filled? > And when OpenOffice finally gets a working AMD64 version, I fully expect the AMD64 packages to replace the i386 packages when I do a yum update. Packaging is hard; let's go shopping! -- Nicholas Miell <nmiell@xxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
