Le Ven 31 mars 2006 13:17, Andy Green a écrit : > Eric S. Raymond wrote: >> Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> The existing one seems to have better metrics for assessing >>> compliance, less danger and greater longer-term stability. >> >> Well, maybe. Unless the consequence is that we never reach the mass >> market at all, in which case Very Bad Things are likely to happen down >> the road. Like, no video cards we can actually use at above VESA >> resolution. > > I don't see any evidence for this for 2D. The problems all seem to be > to do with 3D acceleration hardware in the past, present, and presumably > in the future. And that in turn, like everything this thread touches, > seems to come down in the end to patents. No they aren't all related to 3D. Right now the second DVI head of a radeon card (consumer, not pro card) is a paperweight, for 3D or 2D. That is, if you stick to open drivers (like me) So if you've got a desktop system with two TMDSes, you're out of luck. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
