On 3/21/06, Jeremy Katz <katzj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Like I've said, I don't think that a nine month cycle actually does > anything to significantly help here. The problem is that then, if I > have something else pop up, it's easier to have it interrupt working on > whatever big new thing. And it still ends up getting done at the last > minute. I'm convinced this is a fundamental law of software > development :-) > Well it is a fundamental law of life. The gain in 9 months here was that I as a tester could let real life deal me its usual blows and I could still do some testing and finding of stuff before we crashed. I did not have that luxury with FC2 and basically dropped doing anything with it.. and only was able to pick up FC3 at around its release time. I didnt look at FC4 until it came out. I will probably have to blow off FC6 on a sixth month schedule and do some work with FC7. I might be a statistical outlayer.. but it seems to be a constant question/reply from other people using Fedora here in Government land (or us guys over 35 land with kids land.) > Jeremy > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
