Re: Wild and crazy times for the development tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 09:40:10PM +0100, David Nielsen wrote:
> I tend to agree, the 9 month cycle worked wonderfully, Fedora Core 5 is
> by far the best release the Fedora Project has put out yet and as a
> tester I enjoyed having that extra time to see new fundamental changes
> take place and get bugs tracked down.

I was intrigued by your blog suggestion of alternating 9 month devel / 4
month stabilization cycles. <tp://lovesunix.net/blog/?p=62> But I also think
your own objection (people will not take the 9-month release seriously
enough) is pretty strong.

As someone crazy enough to try to use Fedora for real work, the 9 month
cycle is awesome.


-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux