On Mon, Mar 20, 2006 at 09:40:10PM +0100, David Nielsen wrote: > I tend to agree, the 9 month cycle worked wonderfully, Fedora Core 5 is > by far the best release the Fedora Project has put out yet and as a > tester I enjoyed having that extra time to see new fundamental changes > take place and get bugs tracked down. I was intrigued by your blog suggestion of alternating 9 month devel / 4 month stabilization cycles. <tp://lovesunix.net/blog/?p=62> But I also think your own objection (people will not take the 9-month release seriously enough) is pretty strong. As someone crazy enough to try to use Fedora for real work, the 9 month cycle is awesome. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
