man, 20 03 2006 kl. 19:45 +0100, skrev Arjan van de Ven: > personally I think the current 9 month schedule wasn't too bad (ok the > end slipped too much but lets ignore that bit); it gives enough time to > do fundamental improvements. For fc6 it would be nice if boot speed was > further improved for example, and since initscripts are tricky and need > lots of testing... a bit of extra time would be neat I tend to agree, the 9 month cycle worked wonderfully, Fedora Core 5 is by far the best release the Fedora Project has put out yet and as a tester I enjoyed having that extra time to see new fundamental changes take place and get bugs tracked down. If the new init system can be delivered this cycle I would love to see it, I don't see 9 month cycles being a price to pay, more likely it's a benefit for most everybody (opinion taken from the most reliable source in the world.. my backside). But let's get a clear roadmap down this time, what features are essential for the next cycle? - David -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
