On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 20:23 -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Personally, I think it would be confusing as hell to have a single > src.rpm generate binary rpms of which some are in Fedora Core and > others are in Fedora Extras. That would be made more confusing > since Fedora has separate bugzilla product/etc. for Core and for > Extras (and for Legacy). Since bugzilla components themselves are > based from the name of the src.rpm, one would have to file a bug > report from a binary package from extras against Fedora Core for the > src.rpm it was built from. > > I can think of other complications and confusion that would ensue > as well. I'm not sure what to suggest to solve those issues however. Less separation between core and extras. Like maybe none. (cough Debian cough)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
