Re: Questioning Pirut

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 19:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
> 
> >If my remark sounded like a flame, I apologize, cause it wasn't meant
> >like that, I just wanted to say that everybody clearly could see Pirut
> >simply isn't ready yet.
> >
> >- Erwin
> >  
> >
> Then you might cleanly exclude me from that "everybody" list. A utility 
> that knows and understands software repositories is much better for me 
> even with a few IMO minor UI nits. There is no reason for Pirut to 
> follow GNOME HIG. It is a set of guidelines for GNOME applications. Not 
> a set of black and while rules.

Well than we have to agree to differ, and in that case the developer is
always right, because No Code, No Vote :-)

- Erwin




-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux