Re: Questioning Pirut

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2006-02-19 at 17:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Erwin Rol wrote:

> >Pirut's GUI is just in a poor pre-alpha state, it hardly follows the
> >Gnome HIG, it can't do full screen, strange large font, the GUI
> >sometimes locks up when doing "networking" work, and the icons are just
> >terrible. If it is going to be shipped in FC5 like this it will just be
> >a plain embarrassment for Fedora. 
> >
> I bet that a list of bug reports would be better to a non constructive 
> flame.

Well i think that most of those things are so visible that the
developers also know them.  And a bug report like "it looks ugly"
probably only triggers a "yes we know, we are working on it" reply.

If my remark sounded like a flame, I apologize, cause it wasn't meant
like that, I just wanted to say that everybody clearly could see Pirut
simply isn't ready yet.

- Erwin


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux