On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 23:52:02 +0100 Tomasz Kłoczko <kloczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So why m17n-db not supports *only* that scim-tables not supported > languages ? Well in the ideal world yes, and I think will be the tendency in the long run: when I've finished porting the Indian tables in scim-tables to m17n-db, I think they can be removed from scim-tables: certainly I plan to do that for the Fedora package. > Using m17n-lib without m17n-db do not have sense so packaging this in > separated binary package also (IMO) do not have sense. Well it makes sense from the point of view of updates: it makes it possible to add some input maps to m17n-db or update the version without forcing people to have to update their m17n-lib packages for no reason, and vice versa. I don't see any advantage in merging the packages together. Jens -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
