Dnia 02-02-2006, czw o godzinie 16:50 -0500, Bill Nottingham napisał(a): > Tomasz Kłoczko (kloczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Dnia 02-02-2006, czw o godzinie 11:46 -0500, Bill Nottingham napisał(a): > > [..] > > > I expect it's not covered in comps right either - Jens, what's the > > > logic behind this? > > > > (I'm just after short review of m17n) > > IMO it will be better ask why m17n was included to distribution packages > > list. > > Dependency of scim-m17n, replacement for scim-tables. Replacement ? I don't see Obsoletes rules beetween scim-m17n and scim-tables and/or why scim-tables is still around ? kloczek -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
