Tomasz Kłoczko (kloczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > Dnia 02-02-2006, czw o godzinie 11:46 -0500, Bill Nottingham napisał(a): > [..] > > I expect it's not covered in comps right either - Jens, what's the > > logic behind this? > > (I'm just after short review of m17n) > IMO it will be better ask why m17n was included to distribution packages > list. Dependency of scim-m17n, replacement for scim-tables. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
