On 1/22/06, Rodd Clarkson <rodd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Or maybe, why does evolution-sharp require evolution, and not > evolution-data-server? Wouldn't beagle's interest in evolution be data > related, and therefore it make more sense for it to use e-d-s, not > evolution? I covered this already libeshell.so.0 is required by evolution-sharp. This looks to me like an upstream problem to me. If evolution-sharp is suppose to strickly need evolution-data-server and not evolution something is going to have to be dome about moving libeshell.so.0 into evolution-data-server. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
