Re: Removing Evolution on Rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Willem Riede wrote:

On 01/20/2006 07:37:08 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:

On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 01:26 -0500, Igor Jagec wrote:
> Well, it still depends on Beagle :-/ Evolution is a great application,
> but the problem is that it provides more features than I need.
> Thunderbird is just perfect for me. Ok, I'll play a bit with Evolution,
> maybe I figure that I really need some features like Calendar ;)
>
I think more to the point is that beagle requires evolution-sharp, and
evolution-sharp requires evolution.


And that begs the question "why?". Leveraging a library is one thing, but forcing in the application against users wishes is just wrong.

Willem Riede.

Can we cut the hyperbole to a minimum level?. Nobody is forcing any user to install a application or Fedora itself. Can we reduce the library dependencies or split packages into a more modular fashion is a good question to ask though.


--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux