Willem Riede wrote:
On 01/20/2006 07:37:08 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 01:26 -0500, Igor Jagec wrote:
> Well, it still depends on Beagle :-/ Evolution is a great application,
> but the problem is that it provides more features than I need.
> Thunderbird is just perfect for me. Ok, I'll play a bit with
Evolution,
> maybe I figure that I really need some features like Calendar ;)
>
I think more to the point is that beagle requires evolution-sharp, and
evolution-sharp requires evolution.
And that begs the question "why?". Leveraging a library is one thing,
but forcing in the application against users wishes is just wrong.
Willem Riede.
Can we cut the hyperbole to a minimum level?. Nobody is forcing any user
to install a application or Fedora itself. Can we reduce the library
dependencies or split packages into a more modular fashion is a good
question to ask though.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
