On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 11:41 -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 04:24 -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote: > >> Likewise, simply because someone's idea, request, feature > >>enhancement, etc. may not get accepted by the project, it doesn't mean > >>the project isn't open to discussion and community involvement. > > > > Is it? I regret to say this, but this isn't necessarily my impression on > > RH's role in Fedora. > > That's a valid opinion, of course it is possible that the Fedora Project > isn't the most suitable distribution for your personal needs.Have you > tried Ubuntu, Debian, or Gentoo? Just a thought. Might be worth the > effort to experiment with other distributions, in case another one more > closely aligns with your expectations. Never hurts to experiment > anyway. You seem to be mixing up two different things: The project's product (the distribution) and the project's management. I am actually quite satisfied with the product, but am increasingly dissatisfied with the project's management. So, if I am complaining, I don't mean to do harm to the Project, I am looking for improvement. If was satisfied with the product, I would long have quit and would not invest my time on this and other lists. Or to put exaggerate it really bluntly: "RH - Why don't prove us you can do better?" Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
