On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 16:57 +0000, Jose' Matos wrote: > On Friday 20 January 2006 16:41, Mike A. Harris wrote: > > Is it? I regret to say this, but this isn't necessarily my impression on > > > > > RH's role in Fedora. > This is a serious issue but it almost looks like the QOTW that I read today > about python: > ...in reality, some things are carefully thought out and craftily > implemented, some things are engineering tradeoffs made at a certain > time, and some things are just accidents -- but python-dev will > happily defend the current solution with the same energy, no matter > what it is. > """ > > Sometime I have the feeling that this is what happens with the Fedora Core > package selection. :-) I am not sufficiently familiar with python, but wrt. Fedora, I can't deny the feeling this is just powerplays. Some people don't seem to have realized that a "community" project works differently and needs different steering mechanisms than an enterprize controlled product ;) Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
