> >As I see it, it's "having to change your system to change it again a > >couple of months later". > > > > > > > We can fix that by enabling the repository by default or pushing out a > yum update that does it making the process completely transparent to the > end user. Will that do? Yes, this would make me much easier. Users that don't know this stuff just think that there are no security updates after the date when it goes over to FC-L. The old repos are still present and nothing is hinting towards the fact that something is now wrong. Couldn't just FC-L inherit the old FC repos and just use those? This would mean simpler mirroring among others. Also the updates would just continue to work. And this can work on both FC4 and FC3, although FC3 probably has moved to FC-L repo already. I see no reason to separate the two, atleast not since this afterall is supposed to be a community effort on the whole. Not only after RH doesn't want it anymore. -HK -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
