On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 16:04 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 09:51 -0500, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:56:20AM +1030, n0dalus wrote: > > > Would it be possible for redhat to just extend security fixes for FCx > > > until FC(x+2) comes out? I think if I was using an older release this > > > is something I would really want. > > > > The Fedora Legacy project already does that and does it rather well. Why > > would it be any different if a Red Hat person was notionally doing it ? > > As I see it, it's "having to change your system to change it again a > couple of months later". > > Probably most of these people do not want to use Legacy in longer terms, > but want to have see an overlap between 2 releases, because they skip > releases and are afraid of seeing a gap between these releases. > > Another difference is marketing. "FC3 by RH" sounds differently than > "FC3 by Legacy". ... but.. FC3 isn't by RH. It's by the Fedora Project. Fedora Legacy is also under the Fedora Project.... -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
