Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 09:51 -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:56:20AM +1030, n0dalus wrote:
Would it be possible for redhat to just extend security fixes for FCx
until FC(x+2) comes out? I think if I was using an older release this
is something I would really want.
The Fedora Legacy project already does that and does it rather well. Why
would it be any different if a Red Hat person was notionally doing it ?
As I see it, it's "having to change your system to change it again a
couple of months later".
We can fix that by enabling the repository by default or pushing out a
yum update that does it making the process completely transparent to the
end user. Will that do?
Another difference is marketing. "FC3 by RH" sounds differently than
"FC3 by Legacy".
FC3 by Fedora Project really.
--
Rahul
Fedora Bug Triaging - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
