Re: ATrpms and FC5/RHEL5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/3/06, Michael A. Peters <mpeters@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 14:22 +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote:
>
> >
> > I doubt I am going to end the thread, but I hope to.
> >
> > There are two sets of users: 1) users that do not want Core updated,
> > and 2) users that *do* want Core updated.
> >
> > Continuing to debate about why turns into a "emacs vs vi" debate.
>
> which is a completely silly debate because everyone knows emacs is
> better. ;)
>

Ok fine, what about, "Would we have won WWII if the otherside had
nuclear weapons?" debate.

--
-jeff

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux