On 1/1/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On the contrary I would even assert, that for ATrpms the contrary is > true: packages being replaced have a higher maturity, as they have > either been taken out of ATrpms into FC, or ATrpms has enhanced the > build with more BuildRequires/configure options. Packages required at > a newer version are usually checked against Rawhide. Like a fixed readline lib that didn't core dump when pressing backspace at the beginning of the line. :P I think it took the legacy project over a year to do anything about that. But, I digress. (and I've moved on past RH9 ever since...) -- -jeff -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
