Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > No, seriously. I guess you are a victim of this FUD just like many > other people, too. There really isn't any correlation between a > package being replaced/updated and having more bugs for this packages. Humm... I'd guess you update /because/ there are unfixed bugs in the vanilla version, so... ;-) OTOH, I was burned some time back the other way around: On my x86_64 the kernel wouldn't boot. So (on the suggestion of LKML) I went and tried a bisection search for the patch which broke the kernel... but it was Fedora optimizing the kernel for size, which Linus' configuration didn't do. Lots of wasted time there. -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
