On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 12:17:55AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi > > >So you should be able to mention a couple real life > >issues/bugzillas. If it ain't in bugzilla, it ain't a bug, right? > > > > > Thats what you tell people. If their system gets messed up to the point > that getting them to file bug reports is useless or if they complain > about how bad bugzilla is in return you tend to give up after a while. > > >No, seriously. I guess you are a victim of this FUD just like many > >other people, too. There really isn't any correlation between a > >package being replaced/updated and having more bugs for this packages. > > > > > I didnt claim that you get more bugs. Just that you get irrelevant ones. I'm only asking for real-life examples, not hypothetical ones. Given the bad hear-say and FUD on ATrpms one assumes that there would be a ton of them, so where is it? -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpvBq36jZRIt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
