On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 20:11 -0500, John Ellson wrote: > David Malcolm wrote: > > On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 21:43 +0000, Tim Waugh wrote: > > > >> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:29:07PM -0500, John Ellson wrote: > >> > >> > >>> I gather from a 2004 thread in fedora-docs-list that the toolchain was > >>> moving to fop, > >>> but I don't see any fop yet in core or extras. > >>> > I grabbed the latest FOP trunk from svn, but it still seems to have Sun > dependencies. There is an C alternative to FOP: http://xmlroff.sourceforge.net/news.html xmlroff (http://xmlroff.org) is an XSL Formatter written in C that produces PDF and PostScript. xmlroff 0.3.0 builds solely on open source software since it no longer supports a PDFlib backend. It also plays well with GNOME desktops since it uses Pango and the new PangoXSL library As I don't use XSLFO now, but I did in the past with FOP, I didn't test this, but looks more attractive and lightweight (libxslt philosophy) than FOP. -- Marius Andreiana -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
