Re: Status of docbook to pdf toolchain on Fedora?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 21:43 +0000, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 01:29:07PM -0500, John Ellson wrote:
> 
> > I gather from a 2004 thread in fedora-docs-list that the toolchain was 
> > moving to fop,
> > but I don't see any fop yet in core or extras.
> 
> Basically the toolchain is still more or less broken for PDF I'm
> afraid.

There seems to be some progress is this area, according to this post:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2005-December/msg00017.html

> 
> > If you try to install fop separately it requires Jimi or JAI
> > packages from Sun and Sun's installer scripts no longer work on
> > Fedora because somebody broke "tail +n".  Probably fixable, but what
> > is the right direction for me to pursue?
> 
> export _POSIX2_VERSION=199209
> 
> .. or ask Sun to fix their script to use 'tail -n +...'.
> 
> See:
>   info coreutils "Standards Conformance"
> 
> > I tried db2pdf but it seems to expect sgml, rather than xml?
> 
> Yes, that's for SGML.
> 
> Tim.
> */
> -- 
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux