Re: scim-libs not signed error when using yum??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mar 20 décembre 2005 22:44, Horst von Brand wrote:
> Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tuesday 20 December 2005 09:37, Horst von Brand wrote:
>> > Could The Powers That Be consider signing the packages? Even with a
>> > rawhide-only key? That way I'd sleep a little better, knowing I've got
>> no
>> > malicious gunk installed on my machine.
>
>> It is test software, we aren't completely sure it isn't malicious gunk
>> from
>> upstream....
>
> At least I know it is the high-explosive gunk from rawhide...

+1

There's a difference between raw packages (devel) and malicious packages.

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux