Horst von Brand wrote:
Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Gianluca Cecchi wrote:
Package scim-libs-1.4.2-9.i386.rpm is not signed
Packages in FC Devel are not usually signed (except for packages included
from test releases).
Could The Powers That Be consider signing the packages? Even with a
rawhide-only key? That way I'd sleep a little better, knowing I've got no
malicious gunk installed on my machine.
It is possible that we can do this in the future after we implement a
key piece of infrastructure, but until then it will remain unsigned like
all past years of rawhide.
I am pushing for signing of rawhide using a separate less trusted
automatic signing key. It will happen one day...
Warren Togami
wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
