Re: scim-libs not signed error when using yum??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 December 2005 09:37, Horst von Brand wrote:
> > Could The Powers That Be consider signing the packages? Even with a
> > rawhide-only key? That way I'd sleep a little better, knowing I've got no
> > malicious gunk installed on my machine.

> It is test software, we aren't completely sure it isn't malicious gunk from 
> upstream....

At least I know it is the high-explosive gunk from rawhide...
-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                   User #22616 counter.li.org
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux