On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 07:21 -0500, Benjy Grogan wrote: > On 12/15/05, Patrick Barnes <nman64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Benjy Grogan wrote: > > Hello: > > > > I know this topic has been mentioned over and over, and > everyone is > > irritated by it. But why not meet the Mono project > half-way? Why > > can't the hal-sharp and the dbus-sharp, and gtk-sharp > add-ons be > > included in the fedora packages? > Patents > > > There are patents in Mono. But what patent is there in a mono binding > do d-bus? D-bus has no patent issues.. So a mono binding is just > like a c++ binding, or a c binding.. or any binding. > > I'm talking about including the mono bindings in Fedoro system > libraries. > > I can't see how there would be a patent in a mono binding for d-bus? Because you have to have Mono first, before you can build the bindings for dbus/hal/etc. And to make the bindings useful, you must build them. Dan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
