Benjy Grogan wrote: > Hello: > > I know this topic has been mentioned over and over, and everyone is > irritated by it. But why not meet the Mono project half-way? Why > can't the hal-sharp and the dbus-sharp, and gtk-sharp add-ons be > included in the fedora packages? Patents > > At the moment Fedora seems to want absolutely nothing to do with > Mono. Why not try to go a little farther and include mono interfaces > to dbus, hal, gnome, etc. This means that if someone does install > Mono then all the system libraries are ready to do some C# > programming. And if a user doesn't install Mono, then the interfaces > will lie there useless. > > Look at it this way, Fedora should try to do the smallest amount > possible to embrace Mono. Make it easier on the repositories that do > include Mono, so that if I want to install Beagle or F-Spot, I can > leave the system libraries on Fedora alone. > > There are some killer-apps built using Mono. Fedora should get cheeky > and see what they can get away. > > Benjy > There's no legal "half-way". Until Mono's legal status is clear (and that is between them and Microsoft), it will not see any embrace from the Fedora Project. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ -- Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
