On 12/15/05, Patrick Barnes <nman64@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There are patents in Mono. But what patent is there in a mono binding do d-bus? D-bus has no patent issues.. So a mono binding is just like a c++ binding, or a c binding.. or any binding.
I'm talking about including the mono bindings in Fedoro system libraries.
I can't see how there would be a patent in a mono binding for d-bus?
Benjy
Benjy Grogan wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I know this topic has been mentioned over and over, and everyone is
> irritated by it. But why not meet the Mono project half-way? Why
> can't the hal-sharp and the dbus-sharp, and gtk-sharp add-ons be
> included in the fedora packages?
Patents
There are patents in Mono. But what patent is there in a mono binding do d-bus? D-bus has no patent issues.. So a mono binding is just like a c++ binding, or a c binding.. or any binding.
I'm talking about including the mono bindings in Fedoro system libraries.
I can't see how there would be a patent in a mono binding for d-bus?
Benjy
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
