On 12/10/05, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The all refers to the packages, repodata, repmod, etc.. for enabled > repos. Yum would be doing guess work if it touched disabled/missing > repo datas. This is where yum won't go, into this guess work. > For that matter, why should `yum clean packages` only clean packages in enabled repos? The entire conversation could apply equally to all the clean sub-commands. Just saying that 'all' is the combination of all the other clean commands doesn't actually change the discussion in any meaninful way. Yum is doing just as much guess work by assuming the user doesn't want disabled/removed repos to be cleaned. It has already been concluded in the leading discussion that 'all' is simply an ambiguous word in this case and that the documentation might benefit from improvements reflecting this. n0dalus. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
