On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 18:27 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > If yum is so concerned about this "data" safety why is it storing it in > a filesystem tree specifically reserved for stuff that can be removed > without notice? > > But anyway this was not my point. I don't see anything in the FHS that says things will come in randomly and remove stuff w/out notice. It says that the data should be re-creatable. The data is re-creatable. What more do you want? All we're doing is drawing a line on what is acceptable for yum to 'guess' the user wants. > >> Guys, > >> if you don't want to listen to others, and have only abuse to offer, don't > >> answer questions at all. Why do you think every single yum thread is > >> degenerating lately ? Every single poster but you is brain-damaged ? > > > > The only 'abuse' I see > > When people take shots at quotes from a neutral text like the FHS, that > shows they're only interested in harassing people that disagree with > Seth, and have nothing to contribute to the discussion itself. > > (I imagine it's as embarrassing for Seth as having an "helpful" friend > yell the sky is green because you're disagreeing with someone who noted > in the course of his argument the sky is blue) > I'm really sorry you view it as this. I don't know what to say that will allow you to see what we're really trying to do, so I won't even try. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
