Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On 12/9/05, Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Since he insists /var/cache/yum/* must be preserved, I was pointing out >> /var/spool/yum/ would make his choice more clear and consistent with >> general system rules. > > I'm pretty sure he didn't say it "must be preserved". Please can you > reference the post where he said "must be preserved." My email cache > of this thread so far only has you saying anything about "must be > preserved." "But how can I really be sure that ALL the data in that dir is disposable, especially if the user has disabled the repo in question in their config. I err on the side of protecting data. If yum is not told to remove it, then it won't remove it." So this is not-disposable data needing protection. I translate this into data that must be preserved. If it's not preserved it's not really protected, right ? -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
