On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 01:02 -0800, Panu Matilainen wrote: > I guess can live with that, it just feels rather counterintuitive to me to > have to mess with repo settings to clean cache data. If somebody can come > up with a real, sane usage scenario why leaving disabled repos alone on > clean operations is a good idea it might help making it feel a bit less > odd. :) I constantly use repos that are on slow links. So these repos are disabled by default, but at times I run with enabled. I never want this cache to be removed as it would take forever and a day to redownload all the info. So for me, I'd rather 'yum clean all' cleans ALL the enabled repos. It really is 6 of one, half dozen of the other. Either 'clean all' means All enabled repos, or disabled repo means 'only disable from install, but go ahead and mess w/ the cache'. The upstream developer has indicated which side he stands on, and which side he'll allow his code to do. End of story. -- Jesse Keating RHCE (geek.j2solutions.net) Fedora Legacy Team (www.fedoralegacy.org) GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub) Was I helpful? Let others know: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=jkeating -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list