testing updates-testing [was Re: yum plugin suggestion or yum change?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 07:26:53PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Those are regressions that are far less acceptable than the development 
> tree breakages. Unfortunately the amount of feedback from 
> updates-testing repository is very low to the point that many of the bug 
> reports only start flowing in after the packages have been pushed to the 
> main updates repository.

Yeah, I know. Here at least, we barely have the resources to test the
updates that have made it to the main updates repo. I wish we had more time,
but generally we only look at things in updates-testing if they seem
particularly interesting for some already-known reason.

It might help if packages put in updates-testing were accompanied by posts
to the announce list. (I know they do sometimes get messages here or on the
test list.)

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux