On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 15:41 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:38:03PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > Right, that's why I'm not at all suggesting "normal" yum ought to take > > > care of it. Crack-riddled hacks are why we have yum plugins, right? :) > > you _really_ don't want to do a lot of those things on a running system. > > REALLY > > Yeah; some things would have to be pushed to being done on a reboot. Fair > enough, for a whole-system upgrade. > > But how many such cases are there really? Enough that it's guaranteed to be problematic. Plus, the infrastructure to defer changes is likely to be fragile and under-tested. Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
