Re: Pipe dreams: yum-based anaconda a step towards on-line yum-based upgrades?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/30/05, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Right, that's why I'm not at all suggesting "normal" yum ought to take care
> of it. Crack-riddled hacks are why we have yum plugins, right? :)

How much of that crackrock can you safely do from within an active environment?
And how much of it can only be done from a seperate (ramdisk) environment?
I doubt everything that needs to be done can be dome from inside the
actual mounted environment.

-jef

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux