Re: Pipe dreams: yum-based anaconda a step towards on-line yum-based upgrades?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 03:38:03PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > Right, that's why I'm not at all suggesting "normal" yum ought to take
> > care of it. Crack-riddled hacks are why we have yum plugins, right? :)
> you _really_ don't want to do a lot of those things on a running system.
> REALLY

Yeah; some things would have to be pushed to being done on a reboot. Fair
enough, for a whole-system upgrade.

But how many such cases are there really?

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx          <http://mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>              <http://linux.bu.edu/>

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux