On 11/26/05, Willem Riede <wrrhdev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > It would be useful (I have often wished it did) if e.g. yum list x would not > just tell me some release of x is installed, but also from which repo it came > when it was installed. But I'm not sure the rpm database contains that > information, so this may not be possible? no that information is not part of the installed rpm database. That information would have to be encoded in a secondard database that supplimented the rpm database. I imagine there is a very strong inertia against doing that sort of supplimenting. In any event, once a package leaves a repository, there is no way to know eaactly which repo it came from. You can't really trust the reponame as defined in the config, I could rename updates-released pooptastic-updates in the yum config and that name would have no meaning to anyone else. Signing keys you can somewhat trust to be authorative and unique, but signing keys are not unique per repository tree. You can't know that a package came from updates-testing versus updates-released based just on the package signatuire. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
