On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 11:13 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > It actually is dependent on eclipse to build. And tomcat is > > increasingly a "core" server piece similar to php[1] > > So why is it that servers have to be in core? Why not move tomcat > outside of core? What's the justification for having it in core? Hell, > same with php. The only thing I can think of that depends on php in core > is squirrelmail. Zope's not in core, it's in extras and its a server. Why is it that the desktop has to be in core? I think we're moving towards having _less_ distinction between Core and Extras instead of more. Your argument now is CD space, but we're going to want to get to where we have CDs of Extras and at that point, the distinction between the two becomes less clear. I've been one of the strongest proponents of shrinking Core for a while now, but I'm starting to wonder if that's really the answer. But starting that argument now isn't going to accomplish anything. It's not the sort of thing that's going to happen today or tomorrow. And if I spend all day replying to mail on threads like this, I'm not going to get to any of the useful stuff that people want to see done :-/ Jeremy -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
