Re: rawhide report: 20051113 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Changes were made in the build (upstream) that caused the soname to be libmagma.1.0.0 instead of libmagma.1.0 (this should be fixed in magma-1.0.3).

Thanks,
Chris

Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 14:23 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:

Build System wrote :


magma-1.0.2-3
-------------
* Sat Nov 12 2005 Florian La Roche <laroche@xxxxxxxxxx>
- added Provides: to solve dep issues, maybe sonames should be
 added to the shared libs

I'd say they should indeed : That "workaround" doesn't work for 64bit
archs... and doing something like "test %{_lib} = lib64" or
enumerating all known 64bit archs is oh so ugly :-)


I was taking a look at magma for someone, and the problem isn't with the
libraries, it's with the test apps. For some reason they're requiring
the libraries with .so even though the .so.SONAME libraries are there. I
suspect that the build process might be copying the built libraries
instead of linking them.



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux