On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 14:23 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Build System wrote :
>
> > magma-1.0.2-3
> > -------------
> > * Sat Nov 12 2005 Florian La Roche <laroche@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > - added Provides: to solve dep issues, maybe sonames should be
> > added to the shared libs
>
> I'd say they should indeed : That "workaround" doesn't work for 64bit
> archs... and doing something like "test %{_lib} = lib64" or
> enumerating all known 64bit archs is oh so ugly :-)
I was taking a look at magma for someone, and the problem isn't with the
libraries, it's with the test apps. For some reason they're requiring
the libraries with .so even though the .so.SONAME libraries are there. I
suspect that the build process might be copying the built libraries
instead of linking them.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/
gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
