Dne 13. 03. 25 v 8:31 dop. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 3/12/25 12:45 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 11. 03. 25 v 10:36 dop. Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
It's exactly for reasons like this that rpm will not even try to automatically setup the signing - it has no way of
knowing what the right thing is.
Mock has it's own signing plugin, rpm wont interfere with it:
https://rpm-software-management.github.io/mock/Plugin-Sign
Hmm, but this plugin is not enabled by default. And it is not even enabled in Copr where packages are signed after
Mock finishes and passed to obs-sign.
Can you provide a Copr project with RPM 6.0 build that I can try (I did not find it in the Change document)?
We don't provide any "official" builds for any version, but
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pmatilai/rpm-snapshot/ is ~daily-weekly builds of rpm git master branch,
currently in pre-6.0. I run this on my laptop at all times, so it's not expected to eat anybodys kittens for breakfast
but of course, approach with caution.
Great. Thank you. I think others can appreciate this too and you can add it to Change to How To Test section.
mock and copr seem to be working fine, but it's possible I'm not testing some specific thing that does actually break
with this.
I created
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/1560
to gather any feedback with mock and rpm 6.0 testing.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
