On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 2:27 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Wouldn't the config-file-as-separate-source-file approach would be > > more or less backwards compatible, > > whereas creating the config snippet in-line is only compatible with F42+? > > Naively, I would think that the more-or-less-backwards-compatible > > approach would be easier to conditionalize so changes can continue to > > be cherry-picked or even merged to stable branches. > > Probably. But there are many options how to do conditionalization, so > I'm just providing a basic approach that works cleanly in F42, which > is something that I can reasonably do myself. The maintainers can use > that as a starting point and adjust to their preferences if they wish. > > (FWIW, I don't think such conditionalization would be terribly useful. > The approach with %sysusers_create_compat was cumbersome so I think > it's fine to leave older branches as they were.) Thanks for clarifying! Makes sense, I suppose. Fabio -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
