On Sa, 25.01.25 09:27, Peter Robinson (pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > trousers > > Trousers needs to be the same as the the tpm2-tss as they both deal with > the TPM (the former v1 variants the later TPMv2). What's the background here? Is this about device access? i.e. do both packages install a udev rule to pass ownership of the relevant tpm devices to the special "tss" group? Given the ubiquity of tpm devices I am kinda tempted to move the "tss" group and rules into systemd/udev proper. Then all relevant other packages could drop their rules and there would not be any conflict of ownership anymore. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Berlin -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
