On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 12:36:33PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Wouldn't the config-file-as-separate-source-file approach would be > more or less backwards compatible, > whereas creating the config snippet in-line is only compatible with F42+? > Naively, I would think that the more-or-less-backwards-compatible > approach would be easier to conditionalize so changes can continue to > be cherry-picked or even merged to stable branches. Probably. But there are many options how to do conditionalization, so I'm just providing a basic approach that works cleanly in F42, which is something that I can reasonably do myself. The maintainers can use that as a starting point and adjust to their preferences if they wish. (FWIW, I don't think such conditionalization would be terribly useful. The approach with %sysusers_create_compat was cumbersome so I think it's fine to leave older branches as they were.) Zbyszek -- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
