Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > - QoS > > - inter-interface dependencies > > - configuration profiles > > - multi-host configuration > > - routing rules > > - ifrename support > > - ifplugd support > > [...] > > - EXTENSIBLE DESIGN > > > > I (and other people) find solutions of everyday tasks with /etc/net. I don't > > want to make others think the way I do, but I need a way to give people choice > > freedom within FC. This freedom is demanded. > > Generally... network-scripts will eventually go away - things will > be moved to a framework involving NetworkManager. Hence, I don't > believe pulling in an entirely different framework in the interim > is really worth it. Moreover, some of the things you mention above are either: a) supported in the scripts already (ifrename) b) supported via NetworkManager (ifplugd, configuration profiles) c) not really as important in a long term view (ifrename, again :) ) Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
