Denis Ovsienko (linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > Those who edit ifcfg-eth0 once a year will not want to learn a new way to do it. > But those who need more than current initscripts (Ok, network part of > initscripts) can provide, are left with rc.local and an editor. Here is a > list of what currently /etc/net can do but initscripts can't: > - QoS > - inter-interface dependencies > - configuration profiles > - multi-host configuration > - routing rules > - ifrename support > - ifplugd support > [...] > - EXTENSIBLE DESIGN > > I (and other people) find solutions of everyday tasks with /etc/net. I don't > want to make others think the way I do, but I need a way to give people choice > freedom within FC. This freedom is demanded. Generally... network-scripts will eventually go away - things will be moved to a framework involving NetworkManager. Hence, I don't believe pulling in an entirely different framework in the interim is really worth it. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
