On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 04:09:28PM +0100, Simon de Vlieger wrote: > On 12/28/24 6:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sat, 2024-12-28 at 14:28 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 2:31 PM Mattia Verga via devel > > > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd like to ask if it would be possible to post all the "compose > > > > reports" to an ad hoc mailing list. The reason is that when I need to > > > > search the mailing list history for a topic which was previously > > > > covered, I get swamped by those compose report messages. > > > > > > > > If the message is recent enough to be in my local archive, I can use an > > > > advanced filter from my email client, but most of the time I need the > > > > search engine provided by the lists web interface, which become > > > > completely useless for the devel mailing list. > > > > > > I think there would be sufficient interest in moving compose reports > > > to a separate (opt-in) mailing list to make that happen. It's been > > > discussed multiple times over the years ... > > > Not sure *where* you would need to propose such a change (releng? > > > infra? fesco? ...), but if I had to vote on the decision, I'd +1 it :) > > > > releng, I'd say. It's a releng script that sends those mails. Creating > > the list would be infra but it's mostly the same people and there's > > probably no need for two tickets. > > > > We did this for test reports a while ago, it seems to be working. > > I've created the `releng` ticket [1] though I feel it'd need at least some > discussion in one of the other relevant groups (FESco?). They're probably > being sent to devel@ for a reason :) > > [1]: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12511 I'd like to respectfully ask that we don't change anything until after the holidays to allow for time for everyone who doesn't happen to be watching this list to weigh in. The last time we discussed this I was on the side of keeping them, because sometimes folks replied to them and noted something of use to others. However, I am not sure how often that happens anymore, and someone could reply to devel list quoting the report from another list. So, I'm kinda on the fence anymore. It's worth noting that they already do go to the test-reports list, so if we decide to drop them here we should just point people there instead of making yet another list. (IMHO). That said, I am not sure how this is going to help the orig problem? All the old 20+ years of historical ones are still in the list archives, wouldn't those cause problems for your searches moving forward? Or is there a specific search type that would be helped? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
